The most revealing line is when Orwell writes. There were three wars between the British oppressors and the Burmese. When I pulled the trigger I did not hear the bang or feel the kick — one never does when a shot goes home — but I heard the devilish roar of glee that went up from the crowd. Various Burmans stopped me on the way and told me about the elephant's doings. Orwell cites his regular harassment by the locals to display tensions between the British and the locals in imperialism, and his inability to perform a proper task to display the fickle rule of colonizing nations.
Orwell feels uncomfortable—he had not planned to shoot the elephant, and requested the rifle only for self-defense. British Empire, Burma, Colonialism 913 Words 3 Pages Shooting an Elephant analysis Giving in can either be good or bad. Orwell chooses to focus in on a subject who is at the forefront of the complex issue—as he holds allegiance to the empire, yet he feels for the exploited Burmese. The people treated the police officers of Burma any kind of way. Finally staying down after the third shot the elephant still lives, just as the Burmese people are still there but with less strength and hope after the wars.
The solider can come from different branches of the Military. The rifle was a beautiful German thing with cross-hair sights. Throughout the essay, Orwell shows concern regarding how his appearance is seen through others. Thus Orwell must complete his role, what is expected of him, and do definite things. It is in the state of Andhra Pradesh in the southeastern part of the country Dravidian lower-caste Indian who speaks his own language, Dravidian Turkish and Arabic words: Sahib master, sir.
This is exactly what Orwell wants the reader to feel. That was a difficult times for both countries. He presents the reader with his interpretations in clear, expository prose. In the end the sneering yellow faces of young men that met me everywhere, the insults hooted after me when I was at a safe distance, got badly on my nerves. The elephant broke its chain and its owner is away.
He cannot tolerate mistreatment from the Burmese, even though he understands that he, as a colonist, is in the wrong. Orwell uses metaphors to represent his feelings on imperialism, intimate struggles with his own personal morals,. Here was I, the white man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed native crowd — seemingly the leading actor of the piece; but in reality I was only an absurd puppet pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind. Anxiety, Belief, Ethos 925 Words 3 Pages Shooting an Elephant A price is payed to save oneself from humiliation, but, being pressured into doing something that one doesn't want to do, makes people feel lost and pushed into a big problem. Orwell, the imperialist, cannot do anything other than what the Burmese expect him to do. He also uses similes in his story to make the reader understand and visualize the occurrence. It seemed to me that it would be murder to shoot him.
Orwell is explaining how the elephant was destroying homes and killed a native, one might notice how Orwell makes special note of disturbing imagery. Shooting an Elephant: a Study Guide. I shoved the cartridges into the magazine and lay down on the road to get a better aim. Orwell uses an ethological appeal and anecdotal evidence to support his claim that imperialism causes harm not only to the native people being oppressed, but also the oppressors, and produces poor leadership. When a nimble Burman tripped me up on the football field and the referee another Burman looked the other way, the crowd yelled with hideous laughter. However, while Orwell considers the empire an unconscionable tyranny, he still hates the insolent Burmese who torment him. In the same way, the British empire is inhumane not out of necessity, but rather out of reactionary ignorance regarding both the land it has colonized and the pernicious way that colonization acts on both the colonized and the colonizer.
He loads the gun, lies on the road, and takes aim at the elephant. He fires at its heart, but the elephant hardly seems to notice the bullets. Because it is both a harmless animal and a valuable piece of property, it is clear that there is no ethical or practical reason to hurt the elephant. His interpretation of events is woven through his narrative descriptions of those events. Throughout the essay, the narrator expresses uncertainty about the identity of the true oppressors.
In the novel 1984, by George Orwell, the use of power and control is dominant throughout this story and is shown through each aspect of characters and settings. Conclusion The text binds the psychological factors of the narrator through his superiority complex, dilemma, insecurity, guilt and sympathy. His popular essay uses imagery to recount a moral dilemma he had faced early in life. While Orwell may theoretically be opposed to his position as a police officer in Burmese society, he is driven to uphold it out of fear of ridicule. Whether he shoots it or not, not everyone would be pleased with his decision. On a side-note, Burma was a free kingdom until British expansion came in. That is the paradox of colonialism—that colonial propriety comes to force the colonizer to act barbarously.
The elephant was ravaging the bazaar, destroying bamboo huts. And he shows how the influences of Imperialism harm both sides. Blair found himself in Moulmein. The author uses general data, statistics, editorial cartoons, rhetorical questions, comparison and contrast to present his stance on gun control and the safety of American citizens. As soon as I saw the elephant I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him. He becomes isolated as a result of the time period in which he lives, because of his forced loyalty to the British Empire and all that is dictated by its history.
Then he comes to a scene where a woman is shooing naked children away. In this specific ad, there are examples of Pathos and Ethos used in order to have a successful advertisement. I did not know what I could do, but I wanted to see what was happening and I got on to a pony and started out. In the essay he writes not just about his personal experience with the elephant but how metaphorical the experience is to Imperialism and his views on the matter. What do you think he means by this sentence? I was mo mentarily worth watching. Orwell has a number of reasons that justify killing the elephant. The killing event actually makes him feel important.